The impact of Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation
Key similarities and differences
A major similarity is the scope of applicability: the two disclosure requirements largely apply to FMPs with operations in the EU.
One difference between these independent regulations is that the EU taxonomy helps ascertain the sustainability of any economic activity. Figure 1 shows how Actions 7 and 9 of the EU’s Sustainable Finance Action Plan are in line with the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR). These two disclosure requirements pertain to corporations and FMPs, respectively. The EU taxonomy provides the classification system that determines the sustainability of economic activities disclosed as part of the SFDR. Thus, the taxonomy validates the specificity of the regulations under the SFDR.
The two regulations aim to increase sustainability-related disclosures. On the face it, they seem to be adding to the administrative burden, but they actually impact the real market and economy.
Companies wanting to ensure sustainability are likely to attract market interest
Their capital-raising ability will be enhanced, helping them gain a competitive advantage
They can develop better financial products with sustainability-linked features, making these products attractive to conscious customers
Disclosure requirements would necessitate companies including sustainability as a strategic priority in decision making
Financing entities can refer to the taxonomy to determine which factors to focus on. Enhanced focus on transparency and disclosures would generate value not only for them, but also for relevant stakeholders.
Investors would have access to detailed information on ESG risks, enhancing the quality of investments that would generate long-term financial and non-financial returns.
Green investments are expected to increase as institutional and retail investors lean towards investments that would make their entire portfolio green. The flip side would be the flow of finances towards low-margin investments with environmental and social value.
Financing entities are free to choose whether they want to follow the criteria under the taxonomy that ensures the financing products reaching customers are actually green.
The SFDR applies at the entity level as well as the product level. Simply put, this means asset managers have to report on sustainability risks both for themselves and their financial products or funds.
Acuity’s Value Proposition
We have been assisting our global clients with ESG and sustainability reporting, providing bespoke solutions to meet sustainability objectives. Our support spans the entire investment lifecycle – from deal origination, which includes initial screening and due diligence, to ESG portfolio monitoring and bespoke sustainability reporting.