Published on January 12, 2013 by Chanakya Dissanayake
How often do we hear that the historical financial statements of companies represent the “past”, and portfolio managers should rather focus on the “future”, given the fact that companies are valued based on future earnings potential? You don’t drive by looking at the rear view mirror, do you?
Once in a while, we get clients who like to do the opposite! They get our team to keep glancing at the rear view mirror, while their own team peers straight into the future. One such team at our office delivered a spectacular result a few days back. It took a year for this to play out, but when it did, it was worth the wait to get the client’s rave reviews of our analysts.
Recently, an IT giant (let us call them ‘A’) realized too late that it had overpaid for an acquisition (let us call it ‘B’) since B had been manipulating its financial statements through aggressive revenue recognition. Eventually, A had to write-down a substantial part of the goodwill recognized on this investment.
Our client, which had exposure to company A, exited the investment about a year back based on our team’s forensic analysis of its business and investments. Needless to say, it takes time for such things to come out in the open, which is when the stock price tanks. Two weeks ago, when the matter became public, our team and senior managers got congratulatory calls and emails from the client for saving them a few tens of millions of dollars.
How did our team accomplish this task? Firstly, this particular team was focused only on identifying potential issues with accounting and corporate governance. This way, the analysts were not influenced by other aspects of the investment decision-making process, which often cloud the issue. The team followed a two-step process. The first step was to do a sanity check. The second was to see if the suspicion had a basis other than a genuine business rationale. Company B had been able to manipulate revenues by recognizing software sales ahead of time, instead of doing so over the respective contact periods. A look at sales growth, particularly when compared to operating cash flow growth, raised suspicions. A closer look at the company’s business history and practices made us strongly recommend the issue to the client.
Sometimes, we struggle to convince clients to allocate a budget for research support, even though using our team costs a fraction of onshore teams. And then there are other times like these, when events justify the cost of the service many times over.
(My acknowledgement goes to Zo and his team for producing this success story.)
What's your view?
Thank you for sharing your Comments
About the Author
Chanakya Dissanayake leads the investment research vertical at Acuity and counts over 16 years with the firm. In addition, Chanakya manages the Colombo delivery center that provides investment research, quant – data science , commercial lending and FMS services. Investment research vertical is responsible for the buy-side, sell-side and private wealth management clientele that obtains equity and fixed income research from Acuity. Chanakya is a CFA charterholder and a fellow member of ACCA (UK) and CIMA (UK).
Advantages of having a remote executive assistan....
“They’re troubleshooters, translators, help desk attendants, diplomats, human database....Read More
Flexible and low-cost model for expanding resear....
Executive summary A host of factors are making China’s A-share market attractive to glo....Read More
Crafting customised solutions: Acuity Knowled
In the ever-evolving landscape of global finance, know your customer (KYC) and anti-money ....Read More
Why positive and negative ESG screening are c
The concept of screening, although having been around for decades, has gained momentum in ....Read More
Cross-Database Union in Tableau
Tableau has established itself as one of the key players in visual analytics over the past....Read More
Like the way we think?
Next time we post something new, we'll send it to your inbox